The Oppenheimer moment is also about money. Behind the ethical ploy of Musk, Altman and Amodei

Amodei, Altman and Musk have called for regulation of the artificial intelligence sector. In any other sector, such a call would already have a technical name: ‘cartel’. But when it comes to AI, most commentary merely adds fuel to the fire of fear. Economic analysis, on the other hand, has a more rigorous task

Some of the company’s employees are mathematicians, but none possessed the necessary expertise in the field to contribute substantially to the process. There is a possibility that its ‘agents’ may have peeked at the humans’ notes: what if the machine had stolen from the human?

Petrol prices at service stations are causing a stir. Fuel is, in fact, a catalyst for public debate, and a practical guide is needed to navigate social media platforms. Here it is

The issues that emerge: complacency, political correctness, caution, untapped potential. And a touch of unease

Behind every apocalypse there often lie very mundane interests. The call for a slowdown and the spread of open-source models

It was the week of the iPhone Duo, the foldable phone, but also of two new Siri features – currently available on the Apple Watch – through which Apple aims to record everything. The company stresses that this is done securely and with respect for privacy, but in doing so, it joins Meta and other firms that use AI to listen to – and analyse – everything users say.

The artificial intelligence company has published a 154-page report listing all the malicious activities carried out over the last eight months on its chatbot. Five cases in which scientists used the tool for “malicious activities” that could facilitate the development of biological weapons