To challenge his former friend and colleague at Report over his substantial earnings, Sigfrido publishes the exact same figures that Il Tempo had reported a month ago.

Sigfrido attacks those who report on him and do their job, but does not condemn those who planted the bomb outside his home 

From the ‘Report’ model to the ‘Lavitola’ model. The champion of moralism, whose own story has served as a lesson in moralising, teaches us that evidence is one thing, whilst suspicions and theories are quite another. Notes for a set of ten commandments against the culture of media and judicial lynching

He perceives imaginary conspiracies rather than real dangers. From Lavitola to Maria Rosaria Boccia, the health card and Peter Thiel 

Sigfrido denies having visited his friend Valter a few days after the attack, but the evidence gathered by the investigators contradicts his account

Following the bombshell revelation about his friend Lavitola’s love life, Sigfrido went to buy a new car and discovered that Palantir’s CEO wanted to block his long-term lease. Or perhaps not

Was he attempting to mislead us? Not at all. Was he seeking an alibi for Valter? Highly unlikely. The guileless Sigfrido is simply too naive

The Rome Review Court has confirmed the pre-trial detention of the fixer, the confessed instigator of the attack outside Sigfrido Ranucci’s home. His lawyers have announced they will appeal, whilst investigations continue into the ‘time gaps’ in his chats with the journalist.