Following the arrest of those directly responsible for the attack, the presenter of "Report" had spoken of the "criminal calibre of the gang", but, whilst speaking to Lavitola on 4 July, he described them as "thugs". Saviano’s analysis also follows

The completely shelled mollusc is part of the great contemporary trend for convenience at the expense of quality, and the result is rather unappealing too. Without the shells, you’ve stripped away the whole presentation and half the flavour. I’d expect this from the Americans, but what about us?

La bomba d'amore? “It’s an extraordinary and unsettling thriller,” says the film and television producer. To bring this summer’s B-movie (from Ceuta to Antonello da Messina’s stolen paintings) to the screen, he offers us a short screenplay: “A film in three acts and three deceptions: ‘La grande calda estate’”

Is the presenter of "Report" a ‘victim of the attack’? Only if you don’t believe the investigation. The rampant double standards that the Italian left puts on display whenever its stereotypes are called into question

‘With these leaders…’ as Nanni Moretti used to say. It is this very thought that made Lavitola dream of Ranucci’s candidacy, but it is also the fear shared by a significant section of the centre-left. Mayors, outsiders, surprises: possible alternatives to the Schlein-Conte duopoly

The judge has upheld the detention order for the lobbyist, who claims to have learnt of threats from Tel Aviv’s intelligence services against the presenter of "Report" and to have therefore tried to increase his security detail. “There is a risk of him absconding. His statements are entirely vague and lack any concrete evidence that can be verified,” writes the investigating judge

"The secretary of the PD immediately linked the Meloni government to the attack, a theory supported by several journalists and by the presenter of Report himself," the Under-Secretary to the Prime Minister told Adnkronos. "Did Ranucci know about the bomb? If I were to apply the Report method, the answer would be obvious. I prefer to wait for the investigation to unfold."

“Television always wants personalisation, regardless of stylistic features and direction. What matters is who is presenting on screen, who is directing the programme,” says the commentator. The consequences are severe: it is the entire ‘Report method’ – a far cry from true investigative journalism – that is collapsing