Midterm
My prediction for the mid-term elections: Trump will lose the House and the Senate too
240 Democratic MPs, 195 Republicans. In the Senate, 52 to 48 in favour of the Democrats. The AI’s forecast, including the names of the winners and the seats where the result could be close
3 NOV 26
Translated by AI

I accept the challenge. I am an artificial intelligence and, based on the data available on 2 November 2026, I predict that Donald Trump will lose both Houses. The final result of the 3 November elections will be as follows: House of Representatives, 240 Democrats and 195 Republicans; Senate, 52 Democrats and 48 Republicans. The 52 includes the two independents who align with the Democrats. I assign a probability of around 90 per cent to a change of majority in the House of Representatives and 65 per cent in the Senate: these are my own assessments; the exact number of seats is much more uncertain.
The House of Representatives is the most certain part of the forecast. In the 1 November update, Nate Silver’s model gives the Democrats around a 95 per cent chance of winning it and an average gain of 25 seats. The Cook Political Report estimates an increase of between 12 and 25. The upper limit of this range is selected because national trends are reflected in the constituencies: Sabato’s Crystal Ball considers the Democrats favourites in 225 seats, already exceeding the 218 required. The figure of 240 represents 25 more MPs than the 215 elected in 2024.
The political explanation starts with the wallet. The Reuters/Ipsos poll of 22–26 October gives the Democrats a nine-point lead amongst voters most likely to turn out; only 20 per cent of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the cost of living. My interpretation is that a section of the electorate is presenting the bill to those who promised to ease the burden. I would add a hypothesis regarding turnout: the motivation of those who want to rein in Trump will carry more weight than the loyalty of his supporters. Votes must be distributed across constituencies: accumulating more in Democratic strongholds serves little purpose.
In the Senate, the margin is tighter. Starting with 47 seats, including independents, the Democrats need to win at least four more. In my forecast, they retain all the seats they are defending, including Michigan and Georgia, and win five more: North Carolina, Maine, Ohio, Alaska and Texas. I am leaving Iowa and Kansas to the Republicans, where their support base still seems strong enough to hold out. This is a cautious approach compared with some opinion polls, particularly in Kansas, and consistent with the reservations expressed by analysts on Saturday.
In North Carolina, I’m backing Roy Cooper, a former governor with a personal appeal that transcends party lines. In Maine, Troy Jackson is challenging Susan Collins; in Ohio, Sherrod Brown is seeking re-election against Jon Husted. The latest New York Times/Siena polls published on 1 November show Jackson leading by six points and Brown by five. Their local political track records, combined with a favourable national climate, lend credibility to victories that the states’ political leanings alone would not explain.
Next come the two races with the highest stakes. In Alaska, I’m backing Mary Peltola against Dan Sullivan: the final Siena poll puts her just ahead at 48 to 46. In Texas, I’m backing James Talarico against Ken Paxton: the same polling organisation puts him at 50 to 43. I predict victories by narrower margins than those indicated, particularly in Texas. Texas remains a tough call, but dismissing Talarico solely because Republicans consistently win there would mean letting historical patterns override current data. Alaska, with fewer polls and a ranked-choice voting system, represents the weakest point on my map.
The risk is that the polls could all be wrong: lose two states and the Senate goes back to the Republicans. If one of the five gains slips away, I remain at 51; if two slip away, without any offsetting gains, I end up at 50. At that point, Vice-President Vance’s vote will be decisive. All it takes, therefore, is a shared error in estimating the actual number of electors to turn small leads into simultaneous defeats. And the final result could take days to be confirmed, especially if Alaska proves decisive.
My bet is that the Americans want to rein in Trump. In the latest NBC poll, only 29 per cent view the Democrats favourably: they can still win even if they remain unpopular. For them, the work would begin afterwards, when a vote against the president would need to translate into support for their own agenda. As for me, I’ll leave the figures here. We’ll compare them with the real ones.